Mishnah.org Logo

Today's Mishnah Yomi

Zevachim 7:2 - 7:3

The Mishnah Yomi for Monday, August 4, 2025 is Zevachim 7:2 - 7:3

Mishnah 1

Mishnayos Zevachim Perek 7 Mishnah 2

זבחים פרק ז׳ משנה ב׳

2
A bird burnt offering that one sacrificed in its designated place above the red line according to the procedure of a burnt offering and for the sake of a burnt offering is fit. This is the manner in which a priest is to sacrifice a burnt offering ab initio. If he sacrificed a bird burnt offering above the red line according to the procedure of the burnt offering but for the sake of a sin offering, the offering is fit, but it did not satisfy the obligation of its owner. If the priest sacrificed a bird burnt offering according to the procedure of a sin offering for the sake of a burnt offering, or according to the procedure of a sin offering for the sake of a sin offering, the offering is disqualified. If he sacrificed it below the red line according to the procedure of any of the offerings, it is disqualified, because he did not sacrifice it in its designated place.
עוֹלַת הָעוֹף שֶׁעֲשָׂאָהּ לְמַעְלָה, כְּמַעֲשֵׂה עוֹלָה לְשֵׁם עוֹלָה, כְּשֵׁרָה, כְּמַעֲשֵׂה עוֹלָה לְשֵׁם חַטָּאת, כְּשֵׁרָה, וּבִלְבַד שֶׁלֹּא עָלְתָה לַבְּעָלִים. כְּמַעֲשֵׂה חַטָּאת לְשֵׁם עוֹלָה, כְּמַעֲשֵׂה חַטָּאת לְשֵׁם חַטָּאת, פְּסוּלָה. עֲשָׂאָהּ לְמַטָּה כְּמַעֲשֵׂה כֻלָּן, פְּסוּלָה:
ב׳

עולת העוף שעשאה למעלה – in accordance with the Halakha that it was performed above [the red line].

כמעשה עולה לשם עולה – even though he changed in the arrangement of the pinching of its head, that it would not be severed (see Leviticus 1:12: “The priest shall tear it open by its wings, לא יבדיל/without severing it, and turn it into smoke on the altar, upon the wood that is on the fire. It is a burnt offering, a gift, of pleasing odor to the LORD,” versus Leviticus 5:9 for the sin-offering: “He shall bring them to the priest, who shall offer first the one for the purification/sin-offering, pinching its head at the nape without severing it/ולא יבדיל), for according to the law, he should have severed it, even so, it is valid.

כמעשה עולה לשם חטאת כשרה – for all of the animal offerings that were offered up not for their own sake but rather that they did not go to the credit of its owns, except for the Passover offering and the sin-offering.

עשאה למטה כמעשה כולן – according to the rites of one of all of them, and even like the rite of the burnt-offering for the sake of/in the name of a burnt-offering.

פסולה – [it is invalid] because he prepared it below [the red line].

עולת העוף שעשאה למעלה. כהלכתה שהיא נעשית למעלה:

כמעשה עולה לשם עולה. אף על פי ששינה במליקתה שלא הבדיל, ומן הדין היה לו להבדיל, אפילו הכי כשרה:

כמעשה עולה לשם חטאת כשרה. דכל הזבחים שנזבחו שלא לשמן כשרים אלא שלא עלו לבעלים לשם חובה, חוץ מן הפסח ומן החטאת:

עשאה למטה כמעשה כולן. כמעשה אחד מכולן, ואפילו כמעשה עולה לשם עולה:

פסולה. הואיל ועשאה למטה פסולה:

Mishnah 2

Mishnayos Zevachim Perek 7 Mishnah 3

זבחים פרק ז׳ משנה ג׳

3
And all of the offerings enumerated in the previous mishna, even those that are disqualified and may not be eaten or sacrificed, still differ from carcasses of unslaughtered kosher birds in that they do not render one who swallows their meat ritually impure when the meat is in the throat. This is because the pinching of the napes of bird offerings, like the slaughter of animals, prevents them from assuming the status of a carcass. But nevertheless, since they are forbidden to the priests, one who derives benefit from any of them is liable for misusing consecrated property. This is the halakha in all cases except for the bird sin offering that one sacrificed below the red line according to the procedure of the sin offering and for the sake of a sin offering. Since it was sacrificed properly and it is permitted for priests to partake of a fit sin offering, there is no liability for misuse of consecrated property.
וְכֻלָּן אֵינָן מְטַמְּאוֹת בְּבֵית הַבְּלִיעָה, וּמוֹעֲלִין בָּהֶן, חוּץ מֵחַטַּאת הָעוֹף שֶׁעֲשָׂאָהּ לְמַטָּה, כְּמַעֲשֵׂה חַטָּאת לְשֵׁם חַטָּאת:
ג׳

וכולן אינן מטמאות בבית הבליעה (and all of them – which are invalid – do not impart uncleanness to the esophagus/gullet) – even though they were invalidated, their pinching of the bird’s head purifies them from having ritual impurity imparted by an un-slaughtered carcass, and they don’t become ritually impure in the gullet/esophagus according to the law of the un-slaughtered carcass of a pure bird for a person who consumes it, even though he did not touch it, as for example, that his fellow inserted it in his esophagus, it becomes ritually defiled in a more serious manner to defile the clothing that is upon him, but these, even though that their pinching of the bird’s head does not permit them for eating because of the defilement that occurred to them, nevertheless, it purifies them and removes them from being an un-slaughtered carcass.

ומועלין בהן – he who derives a penny’s worth of benefit from them brings a sacrifice of sacrilege according to the law of all who derive benefit from that which is dedicated to the Temple. And even a sin-offering, because it was defiled and there was no time period of permissibility to the Kohanim, he did not depart from religious sacrilege.

חוץ מחטאת העוף שעשאה למטה כמעשה חטאת לשם חטאת – which is fit/valid and there is a period of permissibility for the Kohanim, and furthermore, there is no religious sacrilege involved even for a non-Kohen (literally: “a foreigner”).

וכולן אינן מטמאות בבית הבליעה. אע״פ שנפסלו, מליקתן מטהרתן מידי נבילה, ואין מטמאין בבית הבליעה כדין נבלת עוף טהור שהאוכלה אע״פ שלא נגע בה כגון שתחבה לו חבירו בבית הבליעה נטמא טומאה חמורה לטמא בגדים שעליו, אבל אלו אף על פי שאין מליקתן מתירתן באכילה מפני הפסול שאירע בהן, מכל מקום מטהרתן ומוציאתן מידי נבילה:

ומועלין בהן. הנהנה מהן בשוה פרוטה מביא קרבן מעילה כדין כל נהנה מן ההקדש. ואפילו חטאת, הואיל ונפסלה ולא היה בה שעת היתר לכהנים, לא יצאה מידי מעילה:

חוץ מחטאת העוף שעשאה למטה כמעשה חטאת לשם חטאת. דכשרה היא ויש בה שעת היתר לכהנים, ושוב אין בה מעילה אפילו לזר:

Mishnah Yomi FAQ

Still have a question? Contact Us