Mishnayos Keilim Perek 27 Mishnah 10
Change text layout:
כלים פרק כ"ז משנה י׳
If a piece of cloth three [handbreadths] square was divided, it is pure from midras uncleanness but is still unclean from contact with midras uncleanness. Rabbi Yose said: but what midras uncleanness has this touched! Only if a zav had touched it is it unclean from contact with a zav.
שְׁלֹשָׁה עַל שְׁלֹשָׁה שֶׁנֶּחֱלַק, טָהוֹר מִן הַמִּדְרָס, אֲבָל טָמֵא מַגַּע מִדְרָס. אָמַר רַבִּי יוֹסֵי, וְכִי בְאֵיזֶה מִדְרָס נָגַע זֶה. אֶלָּא אִם כֵּן נָגַע בּוֹ הַזָּב, טָמֵא מַגַּע הַזָּב:
Bartenura
שלשה על שלשה שנחלק. בגד שיש בו שלשה טפחים על שלשה טפחים שנטמא במדרס הזב, ואח״כ נחלק ואין באחד מהן כדי שיעור טומאת מדרס, בהא פליגי תנא קמא ור׳ יוסי, דתנא קמא סבר טמא מגע מדרס, ור׳ יוסי סבר טהור לגמרי. אבל בגד של שלש. על שלש שפירש מבגד גדול שהיה מדרס, הכל מודים שבשעת פרישתן מאביהן מקבלות טומאה מאביהן. ואין הלכה כר׳ יוסי:
שלשה על שלשה שנחלק – a cloth which has in it three handbreadths by three handbreadths which had been defiled by treading uncleanness of a person with gonorrhea, and afterwards, it was divided, and there isn’t in any one of them by the way of the measurement of defilement by treading, in this, there is a dispute between the first Tanna/teacher and Rabbi Yossi, that the first Tanna/teacher holds that he is impure through contact with treading, but Rabbi Yossi holds that he is pure completely. But the cloth of three [handbreadths] by three [handbreadths] that that was separated from a large cloth that was [defiled] through treading, everyone admits that at the time of their separation from their “father”, it received the defilement from their “father.” And the Halakha is not according to Rabbi Yossi.